Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
An exemplary single-file skill body: every step is concrete, project-specific gotchas are captured instead of generic explanations, and the workflow includes readiness checks, failure diagnosis, and output verification. The only minor gap is that cleanup relies on an unshown `<PID>` placeholder.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and imperative with zero padding — every explanation is non-obvious, project-specific knowledge ("Use `PHOENIX_PORT` (not `--port`)... the CLI doesn't accept a port flag", "Use a temp `PHOENIX_WORKING_DIR` so you don't collide with an existing DB that may have newer migrations", "Without this step, page routes like `/playground` return 404"). This matches the score-5 anchor 'every token earns its place'; there is no over-explanation of concepts Claude already knows, so score 4 does not apply. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Mostly executable, copy-paste-ready commands cover the build (`pnpm run build`), serve with readiness check (`sleep 10 && curl ... -w "%{http_code}"`), and PR attach (`gh pr view ... --json body`, `gh pr edit ... --attach`) workflows. It falls short of fully copy-paste-ready (score 5) due to minor gaps: Step 5 says `kill <PID>` but never shows how to capture the PID of the backgrounded server (e.g. `$!`), and the body-insertion step is a comment description rather than a concrete edit command — clearly above the score-3 anchor's 'pseudocode / missing key details'. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The five-step sequence is explicit with validation checkpoints and error-recovery feedback loops: a readiness check ("should return 200"), failure diagnosis ("Check `/tmp/phoenix-*.log` if it fails — common issues are migration errors... or port conflicts"), screenshot verification ("View the saved screenshots to verify they captured what you intended"), and a body-preservation step before the destructive PR edit ("Read the current body first so nothing is lost"). This matches the score-5 anchor including feedback loops; no cap applies since validation is present. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | This is a single-purpose skill with no external reference files (no references/, scripts/, or assets/ directories exist) and no content that warrants splitting out; the ~75-line body is cleanly organized under Prerequisites, a numbered Workflow, and a Removal section. Per the rubric's simple-skill guidance, well-organized sections with no need for external references score 5. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |