Content
100%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tight, executable reference: concise with no concept padding, full of copy-paste commands, and featuring a plugin develop/test workflow with an explicit error-feedback loop. Progressive disclosure is handled well by offloading the full command list to the live CLI help and external docs.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence — it never explains what Obsidian, a vault, or a plugin is, and jumps straight to syntax, targeting, and executable patterns, matching 'every token earns its place'; it avoids the unnecessary-concept-explanation failure of level 2. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | It is packed with copy-paste-ready executable commands (e.g. 'obsidian create name="My Note" content="Hello world"', 'obsidian search query="search term" limit=10') with concrete parameter syntax, satisfying 'fully executable code/commands'; it is not vague or pseudocode (2). | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The 'Develop/test cycle' is a clearly numbered sequence (Reload -> Check for errors -> Verify visually -> Check console) with an explicit validation checkpoint and feedback loop ('if errors appear, fix and repeat from step 1'), matching the 'clear sequence with explicit validation steps; feedback loops for error recovery' anchor; it is not a flat list lacking checkpoints (2). | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist, so this scores the body structure: it is well-organized into clear sections and appropriately defers the full command catalogue to the live 'obsidian help' (noted as always up to date) and the docs URL rather than inlining everything, matching well-signaled navigation; it is not a monolithic wall of text or poorly-signaled reference (2). | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |