Content
63%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A short, well-organized instruction-only skill with a clear single purpose and good error-handling guardrails. Its weaknesses are duplicated tool listings and guardrail text, and vague guidance on chaining tool calls and reporting cost/latency that lacks any concrete example or format.
Suggestions
Remove the duplicate tool descriptions — keep either the intro bullets or the '## Tools' section, not both — and state the 'report which tool was called' rule once.
Add one concrete example of a chained tool call (e.g. get_city_time then get_weather for 'what's the weather in Tokyo right now?') to make the chaining guidance executable.
Specify a format for reporting tool execution cost and latency (e.g. a one-line suffix such as '[get_weather | 0.4s | $0.002]') so transparent metering is actionable.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly lean, but the four tools are described twice (the intro bullets and the '## Tools' section repeat get_current_time, get_city_time, get_weather, convert_temperature) and 'Report which tool was called' appears in both the intro and Guardrails. This matches 'mostly efficient but includes some unnecessary explanation or could be tightened', not 2 since the rest of the text earns its place. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Tool names are concrete, but 'Chain multiple tool calls when a question requires it' and 'Report tool execution cost and latency transparently' give no example call sequence or output format, fitting 'some concrete guidance but incomplete; missing key details'. Not 2 because the tool list and guardrails are specific enough to act on for single calls. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The core path is unambiguous (use a tool for real-time data, name the tool called, explain failures plainly), and the failure guardrail provides a feedback element. It matches 'clear sequence with most checkpoints present; minor validation gaps' rather than 5 because the chaining workflow and cost/latency reporting are unsequenced. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under 50 lines with no bundle files and no need for external references, and the body is organized into clear sections (Skills, Tools, Guardrails). Per the rubric's simple-skill guideline, well-organized sections alone merit the top score. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |