Content
53%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The skill gives clear, sectioned behavioral guidance for an instruction-only assistant, but suffers from a duplicated tool list, missing tool signatures, and no explicit workflow with validation/retry checkpoints.
Suggestions
Remove the duplicated tool list — keep tool definitions in one place (e.g. only the '## Tools' section) and reference them from the intro.
Add tool signatures or parameter details (e.g. 'get_weather(city: str) -> report') so Claude knows how to invoke each tool.
Add an explicit error-recovery workflow, e.g. 'If a tool call fails, retry once with corrected arguments; if it still fails, report the error plainly to the user.'
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly short, but the four tools are listed twice (intro bullets and the '## Tools' section) and the '## Skills' section restates capabilities already implied, so it could be tightened by consolidating. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Behavioral guidance is concrete (when to use tools, chain calls, report cost/latency, explain failures), but no tool signatures or parameters are given, so Claude lacks the execution details needed to actually invoke each tool. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Capabilities like chaining tool calls are mentioned but not sequenced into a clear workflow, and the failure guidance ('explain what went wrong plainly') provides no explicit validation or retry feedback loop. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is under 50 lines with no external references needed and is organized into clear sections (Skills, Tools, Guardrails); minor organization gaps from the duplicated tool list keep it just below the well-organized anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 13 / 20 Passed |