Content
72%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is concise and well-organized for a simple skill, but its guidance remains abstract rather than executable and lacks validation checkpoints for the synthesis/output process.
Suggestions
Add a concrete report template or required section schema (e.g. Executive Summary / Key Findings / Financials / Recommendation) so the output is copy-paste ready.
Add a validation step in the guardrails, e.g. verify attribution and that all quantitative figures trace back to a source agent before delivering.
Specify the input contract (what upstream agent outputs to consume) so the synthesis workflow is unambiguous.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and free of padding; it assumes Claude's competence and never explains concepts Claude already knows. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Guidance is mostly directional ("synthesize multi-source findings", "format reports with proper headings, dates, and attribution") without concrete templates, section schemas, or copy-paste-ready structures, so it is incomplete rather than fully actionable. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | No explicit input-to-output sequence is given; guardrails exist but there are no validation checkpoints confirming attribution or preserved quantitative data before delivery, so the workflow is present but lacks checkpoints. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | A short single-purpose skill under 50 lines with no external references needed; it is cleanly organized into Skills and Guardrails sections, satisfying the simple-skill exception. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |