Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is well-structured, concise, and gives a clear build/iterate workflow with an error-recovery loop. Its main weakness is actionability: it lists and rules the core block files without providing runnable templates for them.
Suggestions
Add minimal copy-paste-ready templates for block.json, edit.js, save.js, and render.php so the core files can be scaffolded directly.
Add an explicit in-skill validation checkpoint (e.g., "verify the block renders in the editor and on the test page") before marking stage: completed, rather than delegating all verification to studio.
Move the per-file guidance (package.json, block.json, PHP bootstrap) into a references file and summarize it in SKILL.md to tighten the overview and improve progressive disclosure.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean, using tight bullets and imperatives, with only minor trimmable lines like "view.js runs on the frontend" and "Keep the package minimal and aligned with the block's actual needs". | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete paths, build commands ("pnpm exec wp-scripts build"), and the PHP guard snippet are executable, but no copy-paste templates are given for the core block files (block.json, edit.js, save.js, render.php). | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear numbered workflow plus an explicit error-recovery feedback loop (read error, fix, rebuild, retry up to 3 times, escalate) is present, but final verification is delegated to the studio skill rather than an explicit in-skill checkpoint. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are well-organized with clear headers and no nested references, but at ~190 lines all guidance is inlined with no bundle files split out, leaving minor organization gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |