Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tight, actionable instruction sheet: it locates the inputs, prescribes the test structure, and closes with a build-verification loop. Its weaknesses are small — a duplicated build block, a vague "iterate on the error" instruction, and no worked example of a real generated test.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes competence, but contains minor waste: the identical `dotnet build` block duplicated in both powershell and bash fences, and the garbled sentence "The files, having suffix Base contains the required utility functions". Not 5 because of that duplication; not 3 because nearly every other token earns its place. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete directory paths, an explicit test-structure template, and copy-paste build commands make the guidance mostly executable. Minor gaps keep it below 5: the template is placeholder-based with no concrete real example, and the Base utility files are mentioned but never shown how to be used. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear sequence is present (inspect sample → write test in the appropriate file → build → iterate on errors) with an explicit build validation step. Below 5 because the feedback loop "iterate on the error" is underspecified (no fix-and-rebuild instruction) and there is no step to actually run the test. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | This is a single-purpose skill well under 50 lines with no need for external references, and its two sections ("Basic information", "Task") are well organized — meeting the rubric's simple-skill exception for a top progressive-disclosure score. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |