Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is highly actionable with a clear, validated multi-step workflow and concrete code/commands throughout. The main gap is the absence of progressive disclosure — everything lives in one long file rather than an overview pointing to separate reference files.
Suggestions
Consider splitting the detailed decorator reference and SDK customization example into separate reference files (e.g. references/customization.md) and linking from the main body to reduce the monolithic feel.
Tighten the repeated 'skip the change and inform the user' guidance, which appears across multiple sections, into a single consolidated statement.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is efficient and task-focused with concrete decorator syntax and commands, but a few sections (e.g., the repeated skip-and-inform guidance and the full C# customization example) could be tightened further. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable guidance — concrete `@@clientName`/`@@alternateType` decorators, a complete C# customization class, `tsp-location.yaml` format, and exact `dotnet build`/`pwsh Export-API.ps1` commands — covering the common cases copy-paste ready. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear nine-step sequence with explicit validation checkpoints (Step 7 build+verify, Step 8 check the API surface file), a feedback loop for test failures ('If tests fail... update the test files'), and handling of unsupported cases — a well-formed batch/destructive workflow with validation. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized with clear section headers (Key Concepts, Types of Review Comments, Workflow, Handling Unsupported Cases, Common Pitfalls) and no bundle files to split out, but the body is a single monolithic file rather than an overview pointing to one-level-deep references. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |