Content
100%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tight, actionable debugging runbook with concrete commands, a sequenced diagnostic workflow, and well-signaled one-level references that both exist. It assumes Claude's competence and adds only non-obvious domain knowledge, though explicit fix-validation loops live in the referenced recovery doc rather than the main flow.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean — Operating Rules, a short Workflow, Known Stable Facts, and a Resources pointer — with no explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every section carries non-obvious domain detail (error-code meanings, byte patterns, file paths). Matches the score-3 'every token earns its place' anchor; not score 2 because there is no padded or unnecessary explanation to tighten. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Quotes executable commands such as "uv run python -m modules.trae_patch.trae_native_sse_open_url_rewriter --help" and concrete scripts like "scripts/trae_patch/trae_native_byte_pattern.py", plus the literal byte pattern "48 8b 52 08 4d 8b 46 10 48 8d 8d 20 01 00 00" and call offset "0x0F". Matches the score-3 'fully executable commands; specific examples' anchor; not score 2 because guidance is concrete rather than pseudocode. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Quotes a sequenced diagnostic flow: "1. Classify the failure before changing code" with an error-code table, then confirm path, then reproduce with smallest surface, then route to references on Trae-update or prior-approach uncertainty. The 'classify before changing code' gate and reproduce commands act as checkpoints; not score 2 because the sequence is explicit and gated rather than a bare step list. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is an overview that signals two one-level-deep references inline ("read references/update-recovery.md", "read references/native-route-map.md") and again in a Resources section; both files exist in ./references/ and are not nested further. Matches the score-3 'well-signaled one-level-deep references' anchor; not score 2 because content is appropriately split rather than inlined. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |