Content
87%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A compact, actionable CLI reference that respects token budget and groups commands cleanly. The main gap is the absence of validation/confirmation guidance around the destructive delete and move operations.
Suggestions
Add an explicit confirmation/validation note for destructive commands, e.g. note that `memo notes -d` prompts interactively and to verify the selected note before confirming deletion.
Clarify non-interactive equivalents or flags where they exist, since several commands rely on interactive selection that may block automation.
Note the expected output of `memo notes` (e.g. how notes/folders are displayed) so Claude can parse results without trial and error.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean bullet-point reference with no concept explanation padding; every line states a command or constraint and assumes Claude's competence. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Each task maps to a concrete, copy-paste-ready command (e.g. `memo notes -f "Folder Name"`, `memo notes -a "Note Title"`) with flags shown explicitly. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Tasks are simple single commands, but destructive operations (delete `-d`, move `-m`) lack any validation or confirmation checkpoint, which caps clarity per the destructive-operation guideline. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with no external references needed; content is split into clear, well-organized sections (Setup, View, Create, Edit, Delete, Move, Export, Limitations) satisfying the simple-skill exception. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |