Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is concise, well-structured, and provides concrete operational parameters for the built-in interceptor, with clear firing conditions and a bypass rule. It is a strong single-purpose skill, with only minor room to add validation/feedback framing and tighten vague thresholds.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean (~13 lines), assumes Claude's intelligence, and does not explain what Discord/Telegram/Slack are. It is not 5 because the PROTOCOLS.md backstory and the 'What you'll see' section add slight narrative framing beyond pure instruction; not 3 because there is no unnecessary explanation or padding. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Gives concrete operational specifics: the interceptor file path, priority (90), fire cap (50), and exact blocking conditions. It is not 5 because there is no copy-paste-ready code/config snippet, and not 3 because the guidance is concrete and specific rather than vague. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The firing logic is clearly stated as a sequenced condition (group channel AND not @mentioned in last 3 turns AND spoke within past minute), with an explicit @mention bypass. It is not 5 because there are no validation/feedback checkpoints and the 'first few turns of joining' threshold is vague; not 3 because the sequence and bypass are unambiguous for a single-purpose interceptor. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under 50 lines, needs no external references (no references/scripts/assets bundle exists), and is organized with clear section headers (## What you'll see, ## Implementation). Per the rubric's simple-skill exception, this merits a 5 with just well-organized sections. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |