Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable and token-efficient, giving executable commands and concrete audio-tag examples throughout; its main gap is the absence of an explicit verification checkpoint in the voice-reply workflow.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean — almost every line is a concrete command, flag, or tag with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows; only a few prose tips (e.g. 'Voice character tips') could be tightened slightly. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | It provides copy-paste-ready, executable commands covering common cases (e.g. `sag "Hello there"`, `sag -v Bitterbot -o /tmp/voice-reply.mp3 "..."`, `--normalize auto`, `[whispers] ... [short pause]`), fully matching the executable anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The chat-voice-response workflow is clearly sequenced (generate audio file, then emit `MEDIA:/tmp/voice-reply.mp3`), and the single-purpose CLI use is unambiguous; it stops short of 5 because there is no explicit verification step that the audio file was produced before referencing it. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Content is well-organized into clear sections (Quick start, Model notes, Pronunciation rules, v3 audio tags, Voice defaults, Chat voice responses) in a single file with no nested references; it is not a 5 only because the body slightly exceeds the ~50-line simple-skill threshold and the chat-response use case could arguably live apart. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |