Content
83%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
An exemplary compact tool reference: token-efficient, fully executable JSON examples for every action, and clear sourcing of input fields. The only substantive gap is the absence of verification steps around destructive actions (delete, edit, unpin), which caps workflow clarity.
Suggestions
Add a brief safety note for destructive actions, e.g. 'Before deleteMessage/editMessage, call readMessages to confirm you are targeting the right message; confirm with the user before deleting.'
Include an error-recovery hint for common failures (e.g. what to do when the bot lacks pin or react permissions in a channel), giving the destructive workflow a validate-then-act checkpoint.
State expected outputs or success indicators for at least the mutating actions (e.g. readMessages returns context lines containing slack message id and channel) so results can be verified after acting.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and efficient: a one-line overview, a compact inputs list, an action-group table, and one minimal JSON example per action with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows. Every section earns its tokens, matching the 'lean and efficient; assumes Claude's competence' anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Every action has a complete, copy-paste-ready JSON payload ('action': 'react/sendMessage/deleteMessage', etc.) with concrete field values ('C123', '1712023032.1234', '✅'), plus an inputs section explaining where to source channelId/messageId ('Message context lines include slack message id and channel fields you can reuse directly'). This fully matches the executable, common-cases-covered anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Each single action is unambiguous, but the skill includes destructive operations — 'deleteMessage', 'editMessage', 'unpinMessage' — with no validation or verification guidance (e.g. read the message first or confirm with the user before deleting). The guideline capping workflow clarity at 3 for destructive operations without validation applies and takes precedence over the simple-skill exception. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist, and the ~140-line body is well organized into Overview / Inputs / Actions / Ideas sections with each action under its own header, so all content appropriately lives inline. It is not eligible for the under-50-line simple-skill 5, and the action-group table plus per-action headers leave only minor organization gaps, matching anchor 4. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |