Content
76%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body provides fully executable, copy-paste-ready curl commands across the common Trello operations with lean prose, but lacks validation checkpoints for its state-changing operations and carries minor redundancy between Usage and Examples.
Suggestions
Add a verification step after state-changing operations, e.g. re-fetch the card to confirm it moved or archived, to establish a feedback loop.
Consolidate the Examples section with Usage or convert it to distinct advanced queries to remove the duplicated list-boards / board-cards commands.
Note how to obtain boardId/listId/cardId from Trello URLs inline at first use rather than only in the Notes section.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude knows curl/jq with no concept over-explanation; it stops short of 5 because the Examples section repeats the list-boards and board-cards commands already shown in Usage, a minor redundancy that could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Every operation ships as a complete, copy-paste-ready curl command with jq parsing, and the seven examples cover the common cases (list boards/lists/cards, create, move, comment, archive). | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Setup is sequenced but the state-changing operations (create, move, archive) lack any validation or verification checkpoint, and the rubric caps workflow clarity at 3 for destructive/batch operations without feedback loops. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are well-organized (Setup, Usage, Notes, Examples) with no nested references needed; it is not a 5 because the body exceeds 50 lines and the Examples section duplicates Usage content rather than splitting material. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |