CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

blazemeter-network-security

Comprehensive guide for BlazeMeter Network & Security, including allowlisting, DNS configuration, and security best practices. Use when working with network and security for (1) Configuring allowlists for BlazeMeter engines and infrastructure, (2) Disabling DNS caching, (3) Implementing security best practices for API Monitoring, or any other network and security tasks.

59

Quality

68%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./resources/skills/blazemeter-network-security/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

53%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is well-structured as an index over real, one-level-deep reference files, and the MCP tool documentation is concrete. However, the core tasks offer no executable quick-start steps, workflows lack validation checkpoints, and the three-topic mapping is repeated across four sections.

Suggestions

Add a minimal executable quick-start for each core task (e.g., the key JMeter property for disabling DNS caching, or where to find the engine IP ranges) so the body is actionable without opening a reference file.

Collapse the Overview, Quick Start, and 'When to Use Each Reference' repetition into a single section mapping each task to its reference file and trigger conditions.

Add a validation checkpoint to the allowlisting workflow (e.g., verify connectivity from a BlazeMeter engine to the application server after firewall rules are applied) and trim vague MCP bullets like the 'Documentation' use case.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The same three-topic mapping (allowlisting / DNS / security) is restated in the Overview, Quick Start, Reference Files, and 'When to Use Each Reference' sections, and the MCP section contains filler bullets like 'Documentation: Retrieve location information for network configuration documentation'. Mostly efficient overall (~60 lines) but noticeably redundant — anchor 3 ('could be tightened'), not anchor 2 since there is no concept-explanation padding and the body is short.

3 / 5

Actionability

The MCP section is concrete ('blazemeter_workspaces with action read_locations', 'Required args: workspace_id (integer)'), but the three core tasks — allowlisting, DNS, security — have no actionable quick-start steps in the body; they are only pointers to reference files, and the workflow's final step 'Configure firewall rules based on location requirements' is abstract. Some concrete guidance but incomplete execution detail for the main use cases — anchor 3.

3 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The 'Example Workflow' gives a coherent 4-step sequence (get locations → filter by purpose → determine IP ranges → configure firewall rules), but there are no validation/verification checkpoints (e.g., confirm engine-to-server connectivity after rules are applied) and the Quick Start is a topic list rather than sequenced steps. Steps present, checkpoints missing — anchor 3, not anchor 4.

3 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

The body is a genuine overview: three one-level-deep references (allowlisting.md, dns.md, security.md — all verified present in the bundle), each with a content summary and a 'When to Use Each Reference' guide, closely matching the anchor-5 pattern. Held at anchor 4 because links use a nonstandard URI scheme ('skill-blazemeter-network-security://references/...') instead of relative paths, and the 'When to Use' section duplicates the Reference Files section — minor organization/navigation gaps.

4 / 5

Total

13

/

20

Passed

Description

83%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong description with explicit what-and-when structure, third-person voice, and enumerated concrete capabilities modeled on known-good examples. Its weaknesses are minor: a few missing natural trigger terms (firewall, IP ranges, whitelist) and a slightly bloated catch-all clause.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the domain ('BlazeMeter Network & Security') and enumerates three concrete actions: 'Configuring allowlists for BlazeMeter engines and infrastructure', 'Disabling DNS caching', 'Implementing security best practices for API Monitoring'. Falls at anchor 4 rather than 5 because three enumerated actions plus a vague catch-all ('or any other network and security tasks') leaves minor coverage gaps (e.g., firewall rules, Private Locations) and adds mild padding ('Comprehensive guide').

4 / 5

Completeness

Explicitly answers both: what ('Comprehensive guide for BlazeMeter Network & Security, including allowlisting, DNS configuration, and security best practices') and when ('Use when working with network and security for (1)... (2)... (3)...') with concrete enumerated trigger phrases, matching the anchor-5 pattern seen in the good presentation example. Anchor 4's 'when could be more explicit' does not apply — the when-clause is fully explicit and enumerated.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Good natural keyword coverage: 'allowlist', 'DNS caching', 'security best practices', 'API Monitoring', 'network'. Not anchor 5 because common synonyms and variants users would say are missing — e.g., 'firewall', 'IP addresses/ranges', 'whitelist', 'DNS failover' — but well above anchor 3's generic level.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

BlazeMeter-specific triggers ('BlazeMeter engines', 'API Monitoring') give it a clear niche, but 'network and security' plus the catch-all 'any other network and security tasks' leaves minor overlap risk with other BlazeMeter or general network/security skills — anchor 4 rather than 5.

4 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

relative_links

Relative link issues: 3 missing, 3 deeper-than-1-level

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
Blazemeter/bzm-mcp
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.