Content
65%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A highly actionable API reference with concrete endpoints, parameters, and response-field shapes, but it is a monolithic inline file with some redundancy and only lightly structured multi-step workflow guidance. The lowest dimensions are conciseness, workflow clarity, and progressive disclosure.
Suggestions
Consolidate the 'always read from response.data' reminder to a single location and trim Example Interactions that restate endpoints already documented, to reduce redundancy and tighten token use.
Add a short numbered workflow for common multi-step investigations (e.g. 'find conditionId → call detail endpoint → synthesize') with explicit validation/checkpoint guidance, rather than burying sequences inside examples.
Move the full 57-endpoint reference table into a separate REFERENCE.md and link to it from SKILL.md, keeping SKILL.md as a concise overview so detail is one level deep and well-signaled.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | It is a mostly lean endpoint/field reference with no concept explanations Claude already knows, but the wrapper reminder ('always read from response.data') appears three times and the Example Interactions restate endpoints already documented above, so it could be tightened rather than earning the 'every token earns its place' score-3 anchor. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Exact GET paths with params and response-field shapes (e.g. 'GET /v1/pm/polymarket/events?limit=20' and 'events[].outcomes — array of { name, price }') are fully executable and copy-paste ready, and the examples show concrete multi-call sequences — matching the score-3 anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Multi-step sequences appear only inside the Example Interactions ('First GET markets?search=election... then GET smart-money for each') rather than as explicit numbered workflows, and error handling is limited to 'Retry once on 502' with no validation checkpoints, fitting the score-2 anchor of sequence present but checkpoints missing/implicit. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | It is well-organized with clear ## sections, but it is a single ~340-line monolithic file with no bundle files (references/scripts/assets all empty); the full 57-endpoint reference table and detailed per-section field docs are content that could be split into a separate reference file, matching the score-2 anchor of 'content that should be separate is inline'. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |