Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, highly actionable rule skill: concrete imports, signatures, paths, and do/don't examples with a clear decision sequence and a real one-level-deep reference. It is held back only slightly by a few rationale sentences and implicit rather than explicit validation framing.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean: a compact needs-to-method table, concrete do/don't code blocks, and specific path guidance, with no padding about what fetch or React Query are. A few rationale sentences ("gives the UI, docs, and future agents one stable contract") are mild explanation that could be trimmed but largely earn their place. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | It provides a copy-paste-ready needs→import table, a concrete callAction signature with options (method, signal, timeoutMs), specific placement paths, a real positive vs negative code example, and enumerated test categories — fully executable guidance covering the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The "How" section is a clear three-step decision sequence (find existing API → add narrowest helper → teach the helper), and step 2 names a concrete verification checkpoint ("Add focused tests for URL construction, headers, response parsing, error shape..."). It is not a destructive/batch operation so the cap does not apply, but validation is implied via tests rather than an explicit validate-then-proceed loop. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections (Rule, Why, How, Exceptions, Don't, Related Skills, References) are well-organized, and the single reference references/legacy-client-fetch-audit-2026-06-03.md is real, clearly signaled, and exactly one level deep. The core method table lives inline, which is appropriate for an overview, leaving only minor organization headroom toward the top anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |