How to work safely when many Claude Code and Codex agents share this one checkout at once. Use before editing any file, before concluding someone reverted your work, before any branch operation, and before committing, pushing, or merging — this is almost always relevant here.
Steve runs many Claude Code and Codex sessions against this one checkout on purpose, often on the same branch or file. Default assumption on every task: the working tree is shared branch state. Read existing changes before editing them, and never reset, clean, stash, or overwrite local work without explicit authorization.
Before touching a file that already has uncommitted changes, re-read it and build your edit on top of what's there. Landing your own complete fix over a peer's in-progress one has happened repeatedly — "another agent landed its own complete fix for the exact same bug in the exact same file, overwriting my in-progress edits on disk." There is no conflict, no warning; the edit vanishes.
git diff --stat line counts are not evidence of a revert — a refactor can
show the same magnitude of deletions. An agent once announced a revert from
stat counts alone and was wrong; it cost a full investigation to disprove.
Before you say "reverted" out loud, run:
git log --oneline <base>..HEAD # what actually landed, in order
git diff <base>..HEAD -- <path> # the real hunks for the files in questionRead the hunks: a revert removes logic and puts nothing equivalent back; a
refactor removes the same lines and adds different code doing the same job.
Only the hunks tell you which happened — never --stat alone.
Shallow clones and grafted worktrees do not have complete ancestry. Treat
git log -S and git merge-base --is-ancestor results at their boundary as
inconclusive; fetch complete history or verify the date through the remote
commit or pull-request record before calling a change the first occurrence.
In a dedicated task-owned worktree, create or switch to an available branch needed for the task without asking permission. Git worktrees isolate files; the Git refs are shared, so never move, rewrite, or delete a branch checked out in another worktree. If a branch name is already used, choose another available name. Preserve and carry or reapply local changes; do not stash or discard them.
Before creating or switching branches, record git status --short --untracked-files=all and classify every staged, unstaged, and untracked path.
A switch carries the whole index and worktree, so proceed only when every dirty
path belongs to this task. If any path is unrelated or incomplete, keep the
checkout in place and report the exact paths without asking again.
In a shared checkout, keep its branch unchanged. For an explicit /ship or
PR-publishing request that cannot safely use the current checkout, follow
new-branch to create a managed task-owned worktree from the correct base,
carry only the requested task's changes, and create its task branch without
asking. For other work, use the current branch unless the user gave an exact
branch operation. Keep platform-assigned Builder.io and Fusion branches in
place.
Before creating a branch, inspect the active worktrees and dirty paths:
git status --short
git worktree list --porcelain
gh pr list --head "$(git branch --show-current)" --state openIn a task-owned worktree, do not require a checkpoint or ship:push just to
create a fresh branch; preserve and carry the current task's changes. For
post-merge rotation, follow new-branch's dedicated safety checks.
For an explicitly authorized branch-wide checkpoint, publish one complete
snapshot with corepack pnpm ship:push -m "<specific change>". Do not publish
separate checkpoints for delegates or intermediate edits.
Before you commit, push, or merge, check git log --oneline -5, git status,
and gh pr list --head <branch> for the current PR. If the work you were
about to do just landed, continue from the latest branch snapshot.
Do not rebase or merge origin/main just to clear behind status or restart
checks. Rebase or merge it only when GitHub reports an actual conflict; for a
shared branch, prefer a normal merge.
Relaying between agents by hand is the user's most tedious job — don't make him paste what a Codex session is doing. Read its transcript yourself:
ls ~/.codex/sessions/YYYY/MM/DD/rollout-*.jsonlEach line is a JSON event; payload.type == "user_message" is what the user
asked, payload.type == "agent_message" is what it answered — enough to learn
a peer's task without interrupting it or the user.
new-branch — safe branch creation in task-owned worktrees and automatic
task-worktree isolation for shipping from shared checkouts.ship — the commit/push/PR workflow for the complete branch snapshot.f07726b
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.