An exemplary instruction-only skill body: dense with unguessable protocol specifics (exact tools, fields, labels, and ordering) and free of fluff, with a clearly sequenced pre-generation workflow and a deterministic reuse ladder. Remaining gaps are the lack of concrete payload examples and of any error-recovery loop, plus a few protocol details that could move to a reference file.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	Every sentence carries app-specific protocol knowledge Claude cannot know — state-record field names ("contextMode, pinnedPackId, and selectedContextId"), exact tool names, and payload contracts like "version.nativeCode.content is exact only when it is a string" — with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows.	5 / 5
Actionability	Exact tool and action names ("get-context-item", "clone-creative-context-deck", "creative-context-a2a"), exact field paths, required labels ("reused, adapted, reference-conditioned, or generated"), and an exact ordering rule make the guidance directly executable; the minor gap is the absence of any concrete example payload, state record, or A2A message shape.	4 / 5
Workflow Clarity	The five-step numbered pre-generation sequence has explicit checkpoints (mode "off" → do not retrieve; snapshot versions before writing) and the reuse ladder stops at the first satisfying rung, with edge-case handling for hierarchical and oversized payloads; it falls short of a 5 because there is no validate-and-recover loop for failure cases such as an inaccessible pinned pack.	4 / 5
Progressive Disclosure	The body is one well-sectioned file with no external references and no bundle files exist, so there is no nesting problem; however, dense protocol detail such as the isolated A2A receiver rule and the native-code retrieval contract could be split into a reference file, and at ~85 lines the under-50-line exception for a 5 does not apply.	4 / 5
	Total	17 / 20 Passed

Description

75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A concise, third-person description that clearly states what the skill does and when it applies, with concrete artifact-type triggers. Its main weakness is the absence of an explicit "Use when..." trigger clause and of common synonyms (presentations, slides, brand guidelines) that users would naturally say.

Suggestions

Add an explicit trigger clause, e.g. "Use when creating decks, presentations, designs, or other on-brand content and the user mentions brand guidelines, brand kit, or company style."

Include common user-side synonyms such as "presentations", "slides", and "on-brand" alongside the current artifact list to broaden natural trigger coverage.

Consider mentioning the reuse-first outcome (e.g. "prefers reusing approved examples over generating net-new work") so the description's action list matches the body's full scope.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	"Search and reuse approved brand examples before generating decks, designs, content, assets, or dashboards" names concrete actions (search, reuse) and enumerates five artifact types, matching the 'several specific actions with minor gaps' anchor; it is not comprehensive (omits provenance recording and promotion from the body).	4 / 5
Completeness	The "what" is clear (search and reuse approved brand examples) and the "when" is explicit via "before generating decks, designs, content, assets, or dashboards", which is equivalent trigger guidance so the missing-Use-when cap at 3 does not apply; it still lacks a dedicated "Use when..." clause naming user-side triggers, so it falls short of anchor 5.	4 / 5
Trigger Term Quality	Natural terms like "brand examples", "decks", "designs", "assets", and "dashboards" are present, but common synonyms such as "presentations", "slides", "brand guidelines", or "on-brand" are missing — good coverage with a few natural terms absent.	4 / 5
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	"Approved brand examples" plus the specific artifact list carves a clear niche in brand-context reuse with only minor overlap risk against generic branding or design skills.	4 / 5
	Total	16 / 20 Passed

Validation

100%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository: BuilderIO/agent-native
Path: packages/creative-context/docs/skills/creative-context/SKILL.md
Commit: a941a2e

Reviewed: 9 days ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.