The GitHub issues tracker for refactor findings: issues labeled refactor-findings in the fragility repo, with the plan in the body. Read when fragility-common/config.json sets tracker to github and you need to know how findings map onto issues, or when changing that mapping.
88%
Does it follow best practices?
Run evals on this skill
Adds up to 20 points to the overall score
Low
Low-risk findings worth noting
Don't call these scripts directly. Use fragility-common's findings-doctor,
findings-match, and findings-upsert. They load this skill when
fragility-common/config.json sets "tracker": "github". Don't hand-roll
gh issue writes for findings either.
Settings live in config.json: the label, the comment cooldown, and the
per-run ticket cap. The repo is fragility-common's repo. Auth is whatever
gh is logged in as. That account needs triage or write access, and it is
the account the issues are filed under.
refactor-findings label. Its key is #<n>;
--key also takes a bare number or the issue URL.<!-- fragility-plan:start … --> and <!-- fragility-plan:end -->.
A later sighting with a new plan replaces it. The plan goes in when the
issue is created, so no open issue is ever missing it.<!-- fragility-finding {json} --> block. Plan versions go in
<!-- fragility-plans [...] -->.The scripts rewrite only the marked sections, so people can edit the rest of the body. Don't edit inside the markers by hand.
Open refactor-findings issues are work orders: the factory picks them up
and implements the plan (see factory-run). Close an issue as not planned to
stop that. Plans from a bug report also get needs-member-approval, which a
member removes to release them.
BuilderIO/agent-native
46ed84c
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.