Content
92%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tightly written, highly actionable workflow policy with clear sequencing and validation checkpoints throughout. Its main gap is the absence of any progressive-disclosure structure offloading detail into reference files.
Suggestions
Extract the detailed persistence field rules and UI layout guidance into a separate reference file (e.g., references/state-model.md) and link to it from the body to reduce inline density.
Move the per-phase helper/quota thresholds and model-selection specifics into a reference file referenced from the "Helper and quota policy" section.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and rule-driven with no explaining of concepts Claude already knows; every line states a concrete constraint, fitting the lean-and-efficient anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | As an instruction-only policy it gives concrete, specific guidance including executable commands ("codex login", "claude auth login --claudeai") and precise directives ("Allow at most one revision per participant per round", "revoke the write lease"), matching the actionable anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Multi-step process is clearly sequenced (Before → Collaboration steps 1–8 → Verification) with explicit validation checkpoints, immutable checkpoint recording, lease revocation, and recovery-only-until-continuation feedback loops for destructive operations. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are well-organized and cross-link related skills, but at over 100 lines it is a monolithic single file with no offloaded detail references, fitting the some-structure-but-could-split anchor rather than the under-50-line exception. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |