Content
87%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is lean, highly actionable, and well-structured with concrete code and explicit rules, with only workflow clarity falling short of the top score because the skill is a ruleset rather than a sequenced, validated process.
Suggestions
If a portability audit is intended as a workflow, add a short sequenced checklist with a verify step (e.g., grep for dialect-only imports, run the build against an alternate target) to lift workflow_clarity to 3.
Consider moving the long helper-purpose table and the raw-SQL helper list into a short reference section so the core 'Never' rules read even faster.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Directive and lean throughout — concrete code, a helper table, and 'Never' lists with no padded explanation of concepts Claude already knows; the exception paragraph is necessary edge-case guidance rather than fluff. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable TypeScript examples, exact import paths, named helpers (table/now/sql/getDbExec/isPostgres/intType), and a concrete helper-purpose table — copy-paste ready. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Guidance is well-grouped into clear sections and 'Never' checklists, but this is a ruleset, not a sequenced process, and lacks the explicit validation checkpoints/feedback loops the top anchor requires; it exceeds the simple-single-task allowance. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | A self-contained document with no bundle files, organized under clear sections (Rule, Database Agnostic, Hosting Agnostic, Related Skills); per the simple-skill note, well-organized sections alone warrant the top score. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |