CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

routing-forms

ChiliPiper-style pre-booking forms that route prospects to the right event type based on their answers.

57

Quality

64%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./packages/scheduling/docs/skills/routing-forms/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Routing forms

Shape

  • Fields — text, email, phone, number, select, multi
  • Rules — ordered list of {conditions, action}
  • Fallback — action taken when no rule matches

Rule conditions

conditions: [{fieldId, op, value}, …] — all ANDed together. Ops:

  • equals, not-equals, contains, starts-with, in (value is array)

Rule actions

  • {kind: "event-type", eventTypeId, teamId?} → redirect to Booker
  • {kind: "external-url", url} → redirect off-site
  • {kind: "custom-message", message} → render message, no booking

Public URL

/forms/:formId renders the form. On submit:

  1. Walk rules in order; first match wins.
  2. If none match, use fallback.
  3. Record the response in routing_form_responses with matchedRuleId.
  4. If the action is event-type, redirect to Booker with prefilled name / email / custom-field values from the form answers.

Common tasks

UserAction
"Route enterprise prospects to Bob"create-routing-form with a rule matching company size → Bob's event type
"See submissions"list-routing-form-responses --formId <id>
Repository
BuilderIO/agent-native
Last updated
First committed

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.