Content
96%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
Excellent body content: fully executable commands with precise exit-code and failure semantics, a numbered update workflow with an explicit validation gate, and a failure-triage decision tree with feedback loops, all written with no wasted tokens. The only gap is minor: referenced project files (manifest.json, findings/) could be more clearly located relative to the skill.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and lean — it never explains what TLA+, model checking, or leases are, and every sentence carries project-specific information (exit code semantics, anchor rules, mutation expectations), so every token earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Commands are copy-paste ready (`pnpm verify:execution-lease`, `--quick`, `--update-coverage`, `brew install openjdk@21`) with exact expected error strings ("covered code changed"), explicit exit-code meanings, and concrete file paths, covering the run, update, and failure-triage cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The change workflow is a clearly numbered sequence with an explicit validation gate ("Only once the model describes the new code, run --update-coverage"), and the failure section gives a decision tree with feedback loops: mutation stops failing -> fix the model; trace impossible -> fix the guard; all steps possible -> report as bug. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist, and the overview defers detail appropriately — NOTES.md is signaled with an explicit enumeration of its contents (assumptions, bounds, results, findings, code-to-action map) one level deep. It sits just below the 5 anchor because manifest.json and findings/ are referenced with thin location context and the body inlines a fair amount of procedural detail that a second reference file could carry. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |