Content
85%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable with a well-sequenced validation-heavy workflow and excellent progressive disclosure to real reference files. Its main weakness is repetition of the never-inline rule and concurrency-fencing guidance across sections, which hurts conciseness.
Suggestions
Consolidate the never-inline / connector-discovery guidance so it is stated once in 'Create A Structured Agent-Native Plan' and only linked from elsewhere rather than restated.
State the expectedUpdatedAt / fresh-get-visual-plan fencing once in Tool Guidance and reference it from Core Workflow steps instead of re-explaining the rule twice.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Largely efficient and assumes Claude's intelligence, but the never-inline/connector rule and the expectedUpdatedAt fencing are restated across multiple sections, leaving more than minor repetition that could be tightened. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable guidance: exact tool names, concrete patch operations, specific CLI commands, and literal props (renderMode: "design", --wf-* tokens, targetId/placement) cover the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The 8-step Core Workflow has explicit validation checkpoints (step 7 re-read after every write) and feedback loops (expectedUpdatedAt fencing, fix-and-revalidate) appropriate for destructive hosted writes. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Clear overview with well-signaled one-level-deep references to six real files (connection.md, canvas.md, document-quality.md, exemplar.md, local-files.md, wireframe.md), each framed as the single source of truth for its topic. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |