Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A high-quality instruction-only skill body: concrete, example-backed, and full of non-obvious repo-specific constraints Claude cannot infer. Its weaknesses are modest — some sections could be tightened, and the guide preaches progressive disclosure while keeping all of its own depth inline in SKILL.md with no references/ bundle.
Suggestions
Split the secrets-hygiene and version-history pattern sections into a references/ file (e.g. references/secrets-hygiene.md) and keep only the invariant rule plus a pointer in SKILL.md, practicing the progressive disclosure the guide itself teaches.
Trim the 'Keep generated guidance in sync' and 'Bake in secrets hygiene' sections to their core rules; the detail lists of credential channels and sync commands push conciseness below lean.
Add an explicit authoring workflow with a validation loop (edit → run pnpm guard:workspace-skills and guard:agent-chat-context → fix → re-run before calling it done) so the verification steps scattered across sections form one clear checklist.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Dense and opinionated with no padding on concepts Claude already knows; every section carries repo-specific facts ("hard-sliced at COMPACT_PROMPT_RESOURCE_MAX_CHARS (6,000)", ".prettierignore", "scope: dev" semantics, guard commands). Not 5 because sections like "Keep generated guidance in sync" and "Bake in secrets hygiene" run longer than the rule they deliver and could be tightened. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully concrete, copy-paste-ready guidance: exact commands ("pnpm guard:agent-chat-context", "pnpm sync:workspace-skills", "pnpm guard:workspace-skills"), complete templates (the AGENTS.md example, SKILL.md frontmatter examples, the defineAction snippet), a layer-ownership table, and explicit Do/Don't lists covering the common authoring cases. Instruction-only, but every rule comes with a literal example. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | As an authoring guide rather than a fragile multi-step process, sections sequence logically (surfaces → sync rules → request budget → layering → frontmatter → disclosure → tables → descriptions → honesty/secrets → Do/Don't) and validation checkpoints are built in ("run `pnpm guard:workspace-skills` before calling the guidance done"; the 6,000-char guard "fails the build"). Not 5 because there is no explicit fix-and-retry loop for the authoring workflow itself. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-sectioned body with clearly signaled one-level-deep pointers out to related skills (create-skill, actions, context-awareness, capture-learnings) rather than nested chains. Not 5 because the bundle has no references/ files and all ~360 lines are inline — sections like secrets hygiene or the version-history pattern could be pushed to references/; not 3 because structure and signaling are good and no content is clearly mis-placed. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |