Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tight, well-sequenced arbitration workflow with explicit verification gates and a concrete handoff template. It is concise and clear; the only weak spot is the absence of any executable command or code example for the most hands-on cases.
Suggestions
Add one concrete example of a finished decision memo (filled in) so the handoff format is unambiguous in practice.
Show a minimal subagent dispatch pattern for the 'Use subagents for independent review' guidance so that step is copy-paste ready.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and efficient throughout; it never explains concepts Claude already knows and every section (Normalize checklist, Cross-Review bullets, tie-break order, handoff template) earns its place in the context window. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, actionable guidance (explicit Normalize extraction checklist, five-tier tie-break order, and a labeled handoff memo template), but as an instruction-only skill it lacks executable code or commands, leaving minor gaps for the most concrete cases. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear five-step sequence (Collect, Normalize, Cross-Review, Decide, Handoff) with explicit verification gates ('Verification' field with tests/CI/deploy checks) and a feedback path ('Revise first' outcome) for error recovery. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into clearly headed sections with no nested references and content appropriately inline; there are no bundle files to split out, so it is one level deep by design, with only minor room for tighter overview-level framing. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |