Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, highly actionable debugging protocol with strong workflow sequencing and verification loops; the only gap is the absence of bundle files to offload the checklists and subagent template.
Suggestions
Move the Appendix verification-subagent prompt and the Domain-Specific Checklists into a reference file (e.g. references/verification.md) referenced one level deep from SKILL.md to tighten conciseness and lift progressive_disclosure.
Consider extracting Common Pitfalls to references/pitfalls.md so the main body stays focused on the decision path (Quick Path vs Full Protocol).
Trim the redundant TodoWrite example block — a single line instructing TodoWrite use would convey the same guidance in fewer tokens.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean debugging protocol that assumes Claude's competence and avoids explaining basic concepts; the only trimmable block is the appendix verification-subagent template, keeping it just below the 5 anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable guidance: concrete commands ('git log --oneline -10', 'uv venv .venv-default', 'VIRTUAL_ENV=.venv-default uv sync --extra gpu --dev', 'pytest tests/<module>/'), specific file paths, and a copy-paste-ready subagent prompt. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Phases 1–5 are clearly sequenced with explicit validation gates ('Verification gate' in Phase 3, verify step in Phase 4 and Quick Path), feedback loops ('If wrong, update understanding'), a three-strike escalation rule, and per-domain checklists. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist; the single SKILL.md is well-sectioned with clear headers and clearly-signaled one-level references (.agents/knowledge/constraints.md, architecture.md), but all reference material is inline so it sits at the 4 anchor rather than 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |