Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
An exemplar procedural skill: concrete executable commands, explicit one-step-per-turn gating, validation checkpoints with error-recovery routing, and disciplined delegation of detail to external docs. Remaining gains are marginal — trim a little explanatory padding and move the inline .env/YAML templates into reference files.
Suggestions
Trim rationale prose (e.g., the Step 3.6 multi-project future-proofing paragraph) to plain statements of what the command writes.
Move the inline .env example, conn.yml template, and error-symptom list into a references/ file to slim SKILL.md further and enable lazy loading.
Consolidate the credential-handling rule into the single Mode-of-operation bullet instead of restating it in Steps 1–3.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is efficient and assumes competence ("PEP 668 systems will need this", no Python/venv tutorials), but a few spots pad — the multi-project future-proofing rationale in Step 3.6 and credential warnings repeated across the Mode-of-operation rules, Step 2, and Step 3. Not a 5: these could be trimmed; not a 3: no explanation of concepts Claude already knows. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable, copy-paste-ready commands at every step ("wren docs connection-info <ds> --format md", "wren profile add <project> --from-file /tmp/conn.yml", "wren context init --empty") with a complete postgres .env example covering the common case. Placeholders like <ds> are inherent to a template and their resolution is itself commanded via introspection. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly sequenced multi-step process with explicit validation checkpoints and feedback loops: preflight gates, "Only after the user replies 'done'", automatic profile validation with warning→troubleshooting routing, "wren context validate" before "wren context build", and a dedicated On-error recovery section. Matches the 5 anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Good structure: the body acts as a dispatcher with clearly signaled one-level-deep references ("Procedural details, per-datasource setup notes, and the troubleshooting playbook live in the docs, not here") to installation.md, connect.md, quickstart.md, and sibling skills. Not a 5: no bundle files exist, and roughly 160 lines of inline templates (.env example, conn.yml, error-symptom list) could be split into reference files; not a 3: references are well signaled and nothing is deeply nested. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |