Conciseness

At ~480 lines the body restates the same facts repeatedly — the codex-companion `--effort max` / companion 1.0.6 override appears three times (backend table, "Natural Language Backend Triggers" area, and "Codex Mode"), the dedicated `worker` model route is explained twice, and [references/lean-path-detail.md] is linked six times. Scattered version/date specifics (CC 2.1.111/2.1.108/2.1.217/2.1.219, "2026-07-24 operator 裁定", "2026-08-22") are not isolated in a deprecated/old-patterns section, which the guidelines penalize. This is "noticeably verbose; several unnecessary explanations or padded sections" (anchor 2); it is below anchor 3 because the repetition is structural, not incidental.

Actionability

Commands are concrete and copy-paste ready ("bash \"${HARNESS_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/resolve-impl-backend.sh\"", "cursor-companion.sh task --write --workspace <wt>", the mktemp/stdin Codex example, `bin/harness work-mode on/off`, exact JSON for breezing-active.json, banner formats). Minor gaps keep it below anchor 5: placeholders like `<wt>` and `{base_ref}` are never resolved, `scripts/breezing-brief.sh` is sometimes invoked without the plugin-root prefix, and a few flows (e.g., Mode 1, model routing) defer to files outside the bundle.

Workflow Clarity

The default pipeline is a clear numbered plan → work → review-gate → finalize sequence with explicit validation (self_review machine verification before Reviewer spawn, integrated review gate before Phase C finalization, iterate-until-APPROVE with a 3-attempt cap, escalation on non-convergence, `work-mode off` and state-file cleanup on all paths including failure). It misses anchor 5 because the full picture must be assembled from scattered sections (Default Pipeline, Execution, Review Policy, Phase 0, cursor flow), the Flow Summary is thin, and an orphaned English bullet list about harness_ast_search sits unrelated inside the Mode 1 section, breaking the reading flow.

Progressive Disclosure

The two existing reference files (lean-path-detail.md, monitor-and-learning.md) are well-signaled with markdown links and stated purposes, but large bodies of detail that clearly belong in references remain inline (Codex Native Orchestration, Mode 1/Sub-Lead, backend selection tables, CC version notes), and one linked path (../../docs/long-running-harness.md) does not exist in the bundle while referenced scripts/templates (breezing-brief.sh, brief-card.v1.json schema) have no scripts/ or assets/ directories here. This fits anchor 3 ("Some structure but could be better organized; content that should be separate is inline") more than anchor 4.

Specificity

"Team execution mode — backward-compatible alias for harness-work with team orchestration" names the domain but gives no concrete capability verbs (e.g., plan → work → review → report, spawning Lead/Worker/Reviewer, parallel task execution); the only specific item is the mapping "Composer/composer 2.5 maps to the cursor backend". This matches anchor 2 ("Names the domain but actions are minimal or generic") and falls short of anchor 3, which requires 1-2 concrete stated actions.

Completeness

The "what" is only vaguely implied (an alias that adds team orchestration to harness-work — the actual pipeline is never stated) and there is no "Use when..." trigger clause at all, capping completeness per the guidelines. This matches anchor 2 ("Has a vague 'what' and no 'when'") and is below anchor 3, which would require a clear statement of what the skill does.

Trigger Term Quality

Relevant keywords exist ("Team execution mode", "team orchestration", "harness-work", "composer", "cursor backend") but they are project-internal jargon and common natural phrasings a user would say are missing (e.g., "run all tasks", "parallel", "delegate", "review loop"). Fits anchor 3 ("Some relevant keywords but missing common variations or synonyms") rather than anchor 4's good coverage.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

"backward-compatible alias for harness-work with team orchestration" does state what separates it from the parent skill, but by design it overlaps heavily with harness-work and related harness skills on the same trigger intents. Fits anchor 3 ("Somewhat specific but could still overlap with similar skills") rather than anchor 4, since the overlap is with its own parent skill, not just a distant one.