CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

cursor-do

Delegate a single write task to Cursor Composer via cursor-companion.sh inside an isolated worktree, then Lead-review the diff and cherry-pick. Use when user invokes cursor:do, says delegate to cursor, have composer write it, refactor with cursor, hand a file edit to Composer. Do NOT load for: planning, code review only, read-only investigation, or multi-task team runs (use breezing --cursor or cursor:ask instead).

73

Quality

92%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

The canonical home for this skill is cursor-do in Chachamaru127/claude-code-harness

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

85%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A highly actionable, well-sequenced workflow with real validation gates and proper offloading of governance detail to a reference file. The main weakness is token efficiency: a large bash block is duplicated across steps and the narration-rules section could be trimmed.

Suggestions

Factor the repeated valid_root plugin-root resolution block (Steps 3 and 5) into a single sourced helper or a shared snippet referenced once, eliminating the verbatim ~30-line duplication.

Compress Step 0's violation/normal example pairs into a single short 'do/don't' list; the multi-line bash illustration of verbosity itself consumes tokens and is self-referential padding.

Replace inline Issue #193 prose references with a one-line pointer into references/cursor-cli-only.md, keeping the rationale one level deep rather than expanded per step.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Mostly efficient and project-specific, but the ~30-line valid_root plugin-root resolution block is duplicated verbatim between Step 3 and Step 5, and Step 0's violation/normal example pairs are padded — not 'every token earns its place'.

2 / 3

Actionability

Every step ships a complete, executable bash block (set -euo pipefail, real commands) with explicit exit codes and judgment tables — copy-paste ready, no pseudocode.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

Clear Step 0–8 sequence with explicit validation checkpoints (contract-grep gates, Plans.md precondition checks) and feedback loops (retry once, reset/re-delegate on scope violation, abort on conflict).

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

Governance/topology detail is deferred to a real one-level reference (references/cursor-cli-only.md), and the body is organized into numbered steps plus Containment/Prohibited/Related sections with clear navigation.

3 / 3

Total

11

/

12

Passed

Description

100%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is specific, trigger-rich, and explicitly scoped with both positive and negative triggers, clearly distinguishing it from sibling cursor skills. Voice is third-person/imperative throughout, so no specificity penalty applies.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple concrete actions — 'Delegate a single write task to Cursor Composer', 'Lead-review the diff', 'cherry-pick' inside 'an isolated worktree via cursor-companion.sh' — matching the 'multiple specific concrete actions' anchor.

3 / 3

Completeness

Explicitly answers both what (delegate write task + Lead-review + cherry-pick in a worktree) and when ('Use when user invokes cursor:do, says delegate to cursor…'), plus a 'Do NOT load for' anti-trigger clause.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Captures natural phrasings a user would say — 'delegate to cursor', 'have composer write it', 'refactor with cursor', 'hand a file edit to Composer' — giving good coverage of real trigger terms.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Clear niche (single-task write delegation with worktree containment) and explicit routing away from cursor:ask (read-only) and breezing --cursor (multi-task), making conflict unlikely.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Validation

87%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation14 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

relative_links

Relative link issues: 2 missing, 2 deeper-than-1-level

Warning

referenced_paths_exist

Referenced path issues: 4 missing, 1 deeper-than-1-level

Warning

Total

14

/

16

Passed

Repository
Chachamaru127/claude-code-harness
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.