Content
81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable and well-sequenced with explicit validation and failure handling, and it correctly offloads the blind-evaluator detail to a real reference file. Its main weakness is conciseness: pervasive internal phase/version tags and repeated cross-references add tokens that do not help Claude execute the skill.
Suggestions
Strip the internal version bookkeeping ('Phase 65.1.x', 'Phase 134.4', 'Phase 137.2', 'D43 Option α', 'Issue #84') from the body — these are repository history, not execution guidance, and they pad every section.
Consolidate the repeated pointers to references/blind-evaluator.md (currently called out in the schema field, Step 4.5, the recommendation section, and Related) into a single, clearly signaled reference to reduce redundancy.
Move the full acceptance-context.v1 schema block out of the body into the referenced schemas/ file, keeping only the field-level notes inline, to tighten the overview and deepen progressive disclosure.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and procedural rather than explanatory, but runs ~300 lines carrying pervasive internal version tags ('Phase 65.1.x', 'Phase 134.4', 'Phase 137.2', 'D43 Option α', 'Issue #84') and repeated pointers to the same blind-evaluator reference that could be trimmed without losing actionable content. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable guidance throughout: concrete bash (git rev-parse / sha256sum), exact MCP search parameters (tags, limit, strict_project), render-html.sh invocations with flags, exact evidence-prefix conventions ('pending_validations: ', 'artifact missing: '), and a complete schema block. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps 1–8 are clearly sequenced with explicit validation checkpoints (user_request_hash match, pending_validations detection, TDD Red-log gate) and a 失敗時の挙動 failure table providing error-recovery feedback loops. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Clear step-based overview with a well-signaled one-level reference to references/blind-evaluator.md (verified present in the bundle) and a schema pointer; the fully inlined acceptance-context.v1 schema and recommendation algorithm are minor organization gaps that could live in separate files. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |