Content
63%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-sequenced, actionable workflow with good failure handling, but it is verbose with embedded decision rationale and monolithic—detailed schema and cross-project logic that belong in separate reference files are inlined.
Suggestions
Move the full plan-brief-context.v1 schema and the cross-project alt-flow (Step 2 alt) into separate reference files and link to them one level deep, keeping SKILL.md an overview.
Trim decision-rationale blocks (e.g. 'D43 判断 1 の根拠') and redundant 重要 warnings to reduce token load; keep only execution-relevant constraints.
Add an explicit validate→fix→retry loop for the batch cross-project N-call path (e.g. retry/empty-group handling) to raise workflow clarity.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly actionable but padded with decision-rationale blocks ('D43 判断 1 の根拠…'), repeated 重要 warnings, and phase-number archaeology that Claude does not need to execute the skill. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete MCP search parameter blocks, a copy-paste jq example, and explicit script invocations; some cross-project steps are pseudocode loops rather than executable commands. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps 1–6 are clearly sequenced with a per-failure behavior table and redaction validation, but there is no explicit validate→fix→retry feedback loop for the batch cross-project path. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist; the full schema, cross-project alt-flow, and failure table are inlined into a ~230-line monolith, and script/schema references point to non-bundled paths. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |