Content
92%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tight, highly actionable execution spec with clear sequencing and failure handling. Its only weakness is progressive disclosure: it points to many referenced files that are not present in the bundle.
Suggestions
Ship the referenced bundle files (scripts/plan-brief-compile.sh, scripts/render-html.sh, scripts/plan-brief-open.sh, templates/html/plan-brief.html.template, schemas/plan-brief-context.v1.schema.json) so the in-body references resolve to real materials.
Inline a one-line fallback note for each referenced script describing its expected input/output, so the skill remains usable when a script is missing.
Add a short bundle-inventory section near the top listing which referenced files are required vs. optional, making the dependency on the bundle explicit.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and information-dense: tables for responsibility boundaries, outputs, and failure modes, plus exact bash/jq snippets, with no lecturing on concepts Claude already knows. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Copy-paste ready: exact `git rev-parse --show-toplevel`/`basename` commands, precise MCP params with required fields flagged, a full jq template, and a concrete render-html.sh invocation. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear numbered Step 1→6 sequence with an explicit 失敗時の挙動 table mapping each failure to recovery behavior, and a clearly separated cross-project alt path. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | References are well-signaled and one-level-deep, but the referenced bundle files (scripts/*.sh, templates, schemas, tests) do not exist in the bundle, so navigation points to absent materials. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |