Content
63%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, mostly actionable body with a clear step sequence and failure-mode table, weakened by internal phase-version noise and by referencing scripts/schemas that are not bundled. Tightening the phase cruft and bundling (or clearly marking as external) the referenced scripts would lift it materially.
Suggestions
Remove internal phase/version bookkeeping (e.g. 'Phase 65.4.3 以降', 'Phase 136.2', '3rd surface of the cognitive-load HTML triplet') and forward references to unimplemented phases; these add tokens without aiding execution.
Bundle the referenced scripts (progress-snapshot.sh, render-html.sh, plan-brief-open.sh) in ./scripts/ and the schema in ./references/ — or explicitly mark them as external project files — so the body's commands are actually executable from the skill package.
Add an explicit validation checkpoint between Step 1 and Step 2 (e.g. verify the snapshot JSON against progress-snapshot.v1 before rendering) to strengthen the workflow's feedback loop.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient with tables and code blocks, but laced with internal phase bookkeeping ('Phase 65.4', '65.4.1', '136.2', '140.2', '135.4', '3rd surface of the cognitive-load HTML triplet') and forward references to unimplemented phases that Claude does not need to execute the skill. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Steps 0–3 give concrete, copy-paste bash commands with real flags, but those commands invoke scripts (progress-snapshot.sh, render-html.sh, plan-brief-open.sh) that are not bundled in the skill, leaving a minor execution gap. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear Step 0→3 sequence with a failure-modes table covering missing Plans.md, empty task lists, and missing state files; minor gap is the absence of an explicit validate-snapshot checkpoint before rendering. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are well organized (Quick Reference, Mission, Schema, Execution Flow, Failure modes, Related) and the schema is inlined compactly, but the body heavily references scripts and a schema file that are not present in any bundle directory, so references are not actually resolvable. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |