Content
67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, highly actionable orchestration overview with clear phases, validation gates, and a strong progressive-disclosure table pointing to real reference files. Its main weaknesses are verbosity in inlined pseudocode/historical narrative and a couple of non-bundle reference paths.
Suggestions
Move the Backend-resolved executor path pseudocode and the Work Mode Lifecycle historical narrative into a reference file, keeping only the decision rule and a one-line link in SKILL.md to improve conciseness and progressive disclosure.
De-duplicate the Codex/cursor companion-call snippets that appear both in the executor pseudocode and in the Codex mode bash block; keep one executable canonical example.
Resolve or relabel the docs/plans/spec-ssot.md link (which is outside the skill bundle) so every reference in the Progressive Disclosure table points to a bundled, verifiable file.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and table-heavy (token-efficient) and defers detail to references, but at ~460 lines it inlines a long pseudocode executor path, repeats companion-call snippets between that pseudocode and the Codex bash block, and includes a historical Work Mode Lifecycle bug narrative that could be tightened. It is mostly efficient but has several trimmable sections, fitting the level-3 anchor rather than the lean level 4. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete executable commands abound (resolve-impl-backend.sh, model-routing.sh, full Codex worktree bash block, cursor test commands) with specific script paths and env vars. The Backend-resolved executor path is pseudocode (bash()/git()/raise notation) rather than copy-paste ready, so it stops just short of the fully-executable level 5. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Sequences are explicit (Solo 1-17 steps, Breezing Phase A/B/C, numbered CI-failure list) with real validation gates (spec SSOT preflight, sprint-contract readiness, self_review gate, review loop with MAX_REVIEWS, cherry-pick/contract-grep gates) and an explicit stop-conditions list. It is strong but defers full step detail to references and the executor pseudocode is intricate, placing it just below the level-5 checklist anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | An explicit Progressive Disclosure table maps each detail topic to a one-level-deep reference file, and all eight referenced references/*.md files exist in the bundle. It is not a clean level 5 because the body still inlines dense content (executor-path pseudocode, Work Mode Lifecycle) that could live in references, and one link targets docs/plans/spec-ssot.md outside the bundle. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |