Conciseness

The body is dense and free of concept re-explanation, but the ~60-line pseudocode block ("Backend-resolved executor path") duplicates the companion workflow that is repeated again in the Codex モード section and also deferred to references/backend-selection.md and references/review-loop.md, violating its own disclosure principle. Inline changelog noise ("2026-07-24 operator 裁定", "133.9", "140.3", CC 2.1.217/2.1.219 pins) is not isolated in a deprecated section, so it could be tightened — anchor 3, not 2, since there is no padded explanation, only duplication.

Actionability

Concrete executable commands appear throughout (resolve-impl-backend.sh, companion invocations with env vars, worktree creation, cherry-pick ranges) plus decision tables for mode and backend selection. It is not anchor 5 because the large orchestration block is non-executable pseudocode and helpers like read_contract/codex_exec_review are invoked without inline definition; not anchor 3 because the bash blocks are copy-paste ready and cover common cases.

Workflow Clarity

Sequences are clear (TDD Red → sprint-contract → 実装 → review loop → commit; Phase A/B/C) with explicit validation checkpoints (self_review gate, two-stage contract grep before cherry-pick, commit-presence checks) and feedback loops (MAX_REVIEWS cap, 3-fail CI stop, EscalationError). It falls short of anchor 5 because the solo 1-17 step detail lives entirely in references and the top-level flow is fragmented across many sections, leaving minor inline sequencing gaps.

Progressive Disclosure

An explicit Progressive Disclosure table maps details to eight real references/*.md files forming a flat one-level graph with sibling cross-links, making navigation easy. Not anchor 5: the 60-line pseudocode block inlines content that belongs in references, docs/plans/spec-ssot.md is not present in the bundle, and the anchors #solo-detailed-steps / #breezing-phase-detail do not exactly match the actual headings in execution-modes.md ("Solo — Detailed Steps", "Breezing — Phase Detail").

Specificity

"Execute Plans.md tasks from single task to full parallel team run" names the domain and one composite action, but does not enumerate the several concrete capabilities the body actually covers (TDD loop, CI recovery, backend delegation). It matches anchor 3 (domain plus 1-2 concrete actions) better than anchor 4, which expects several listed specific actions.

Completeness

It clearly answers "what" (execute Plans.md tasks from single task to full parallel team run) and explicitly answers "when" with concrete trigger phrases plus a "Do NOT load for: planning, review, release, setup" exclusion list. The "when" is fully explicit with concrete triggers, matching anchor 5 rather than the merely-present "when" of anchor 4.

Trigger Term Quality

The trigger list "implement, execute, do everything, breezing, team run, parallel, composer, composer 2.5" includes natural terms users would say plus the concrete artifact name "Plans.md", but common variations like "run tasks" or "finish everything" are missing, so it falls just short of the comprehensive synonym coverage of anchor 5.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

"Plans.md tasks", "breezing", "team run", and "composer" form a clear niche with distinct triggers, and the "Do NOT load for: planning, review, release, setup" exclusion explicitly disambiguates the sibling skills (harness-plan, harness-review, harness-release). Minimal conflict risk, matching anchor 5.