Content
60%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured router skill with clear navigation and honest anti-rationalization guidance, but it suffers from heavy internal redundancy (the same routing repeated four ways) and provides virtually no executable fixing guidance of its own. The referenced detail files are not present in this bundle, so its value depends entirely on an external suite layout.
Suggestions
Collapse the Quick Reference table, dot decision tree, numbered Decision Tree, and Example Invocations into a single routing representation (the table plus numbered list would suffice) — the current four-fold repetition wastes roughly half the body's tokens.
Expand 'Critical Patterns' with a few concrete, copy-paste-ready SwiftUI snippets (e.g., an accessibilityLabel/.accessibilityHint pairing or a Dynamic Type fixed-size detection) so the skill delivers some executable value without chasing external files.
Make the referenced paths self-contained or verify they resolve relative to the skill's install location — 'skills/accessibility-diag.md' and the cross-suite routes (axiom-watchos, axiom-tools) assume a parent layout that a standalone SKILL.md bundle does not provide.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The same routing table is stated four times — Quick Reference table, dot decision tree, numbered Decision Tree list, and Example Invocations — which is pure redundancy across ~160 lines. Mostly functional routing content with no concept over-explanation, but clearly could be tightened to one or two representations — anchor 3, not 4 (the duplication is more than 'minor instances'). | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Navigation is concrete (exact file paths, 'Launch accessibility-auditor agent or /axiom:audit accessibility', three real SwiftUI APIs like Image(decorative:) and accessibilityInputLabels()), but the skill contains almost no executable guidance for the actual fixing work — it delegates everything to files not present in this bundle. 'Some concrete guidance but incomplete' fits better than level 4's 'mostly executable guidance'. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | As a router, the single action per symptom is unambiguous (symptom → file path), and routing is not a destructive or batch operation requiring validation checkpoints. Held at 4 rather than 5 because some table rows blur scope (UX flow and watchOS routing inside an accessibility skill) and the inline-auditor fallback instructions are only sketched, leaving minor gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is itself a pure progressive-disclosure structure: an overview with clearly signaled, one-level-deep references (skills/accessibility-diag.md, skills/ux-flow-audit.md, skills/watchos-a11y.md). Scored at 4 rather than 5 because no bundle files exist here to verify the referenced paths, and they resolve outside the skill directory (cross-suite layout), so navigation may not resolve as written. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |