Content
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is highly actionable and well-sequenced with strong verification steps, but it is verbose and self-contained rather than split across progressively-disclosed reference files.
Suggestions
Move the Phase 4 compound-severity table and Phase 3 reasoning table into a separate reference file (e.g. references/compound-findings.md) referenced one level deep to cut main-body tokens.
Trim repeated 'Pattern/Search/Issue/Fix/Note' prose by using a compact shared format or table for the eight detection categories.
If cross-skill references like skills/xcui-ref.md are intended to resolve within this skill, add them as actual bundle files; otherwise mark them clearly as external skill pointers.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and long (~250 lines) with two large tables and repeated Pattern/Issue/Fix blocks; it avoids explaining basic concepts but includes prose and structural repetition that could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Concrete grep patterns, executable fix snippets (e.g. '.accessibilityLabel', 'UIFontMetrics(...).scaledFont(for:)', '.frame(minWidth: 44, minHeight: 44)'), explicit file excludes, and a copy-ready output template make the guidance fully actionable. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear five-phase sequence with mandatory tool use, contextual verification ('use Read to verify the surrounding context before reporting'), output limits, and a false-positive list provides explicit checkpoints and error-recovery guidance. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist (references/scripts/assets are absent) and the content is monolithic and inline; the only file references point to other skills rather than one-level-deep detail files within this skill. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |