axiom-design

Use when making design decisions, implementing HIG patterns, Liquid Glass, SF Symbols, typography, or structuring app entry points and authentication flows.

Quality

73%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./.claude-plugin/plugins/axiom/skills/axiom-design/SKILL.md

Quality

Content

67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A well-organized router skill that points clearly to detailed references and avoids basic-concept padding. Its main weakness is token redundancy from repeating the same routing across four parallel structures, and its references depend on sibling suite files not present in this bundle.

Suggestions

Collapse the redundant routing: keep one primary navigation aid (the Quick Reference table or decision tree) and trim the others to avoid restating the same file mappings three to four times.

Verify or inline the referenced files (skills/hig.md, skills/liquid-glass.md, skills/sf-symbols.md, etc.) so the router does not depend on sibling suite paths that are absent from this bundle.

Consider trimming the Example Invocations section, since it reiterates routing already covered by the table and numbered list.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The body is mostly efficient (tables, terse routing, no basic-concept padding), but the same routing decisions are restated across the Quick Reference table, the dot decision tree, the numbered list, and Example Invocations, which is redundant tightening could remove.	3 / 5
Actionability	Routing guidance is concrete and specific — exact target paths like 'skills/hig.md' with clear trigger conditions — giving mostly executable direction with only minor gaps, though it carries no runnable code as a pure router.	4 / 5
Workflow Clarity	The route-selection sequence is unambiguous via the decision tree and numbered list, and no destructive/batch operations exist that would demand validation checkpoints; it lacks the explicit validate-feedback loops of an anchor-5 workflow.	4 / 5
Progressive Disclosure	The skill is a well-structured overview with clearly signaled, one-level-deep references and good navigation, but the referenced paths (skills/hig.md, skills/liquid-glass.md, etc.) do not exist within this skill's bundle, so the structure cannot be fully verified and leans on an external suite.	4 / 5
	Total	15 / 20 Passed

Description

78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong, third-person description with an explicit trigger clause and a well-scoped Apple HIG niche. It lists concrete domains comprehensively, with only minor room to add synonyms and tighten the what/when pairing.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Names several concrete capability areas with action verbs — 'making design decisions, implementing HIG patterns, Liquid Glass, SF Symbols, typography, or structuring app entry points and authentication flows' — covering the domain comprehensively with only minor gaps.	4 / 5
Completeness	Explicit 'Use when...' clause answers 'when' clearly, and the enumerated actions convey 'what'; it stops short of the anchor-5 example where both what and when are spelled out with maximally concrete trigger phrases.	4 / 5
Trigger Term Quality	Includes natural terms users say (HIG patterns, Liquid Glass, SF Symbols, typography, authentication flows) with good coverage; a few synonyms or casual variants are missing, keeping it just below comprehensive.	4 / 5
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	The Apple-specific combination of HIG, Liquid Glass, and SF Symbols carves a clear niche with distinct triggers and minimal conflict risk against generic design skills.	5 / 5
	Total	17 / 20 Passed

Validation

93%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

Criteria	Description	Result
referenced_paths_exist	Referenced path issues: 1 missing	Warning

	Total	15 / 16 Passed

Repository: CharlesWiltgen/Axiom
Path: .claude-plugin/plugins/axiom/skills/axiom-design/SKILL.md
Commit: 4ae86a3

Reviewed: 5 days ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.