Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, mostly lean orchestrator workflow with concrete, actionable guidance and clear phase sequencing. Its main weakness is mild redundancy in scope handling and a few implicit rather than formal validation checkpoints.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence, skipping explanations of Swift, CoreData, etc.; only minor redundancy exists in re-stating the DIFF SCOPE handling across Phases 0, 1, and 2. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is concrete and executable for an instruction-only skill: exact Glob patterns, grep signal tables, fixed output filenames, and verbatim scope blocks to forward to sub-agents, with only minor implicit details. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Phases 0-4 are clearly sequenced with explicit checkpoints ('Wait for all agents to return before proceeding', dedup step, scope-as-hard-boundary drop rule); a few validation steps are implicit rather than formal checklists. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files are needed; the ~190-line single file is well-organized into clearly headed sections (Phase 0-4, Guidelines, Related) with one-level navigation via the Related section, so progressive disclosure is clean and easy to navigate. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |