CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

axiom-health-check

Use when the user wants a comprehensive project-wide audit, full health check, or scan across all domains.

69

Quality

83%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

85%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A highly actionable, well-sequenced orchestrator skill with concrete commands, paths, and explicit validation/dedup checkpoints; its only weakness is moderate verbosity in the auditor tables and repeated scope-block text that could be compressed.

Suggestions

Compress the always-run and conditional auditor tables (e.g., move the long grep-pattern→auditor mapping into a references table file) to reduce token load on the context window.

Factor the verbatim DIFF SCOPE block into a single canonical snippet referenced once instead of restating it across Phase 0 and Phase 2.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is dense and mostly instruction-oriented without padding with concepts Claude already knows, but the long always-run/conditional auditor tables and repeated scope-block verbatim text could be tightened for token efficiency.

2 / 3

Actionability

Concrete executable guidance throughout: specific Glob/Grep patterns, exact output file paths (`scratch/health-check-{area}-{date}.md`), literal scope-block text to forward, and a fully specified report schema with a summary table.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

A clear four-phase sequence (Scope → Detect → Launch parallel → Collect/Dedup → Report) with explicit checkpoints: wait for all agents via TaskOutput, dedup by file:line, drop out-of-scope findings before dedup, and handle auditor failures/timeouts and >100-finding output limits.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

Well-organized single-file overview with clear section structure and no bundle files referenced; the auditor-selection tables and verbatim scope block are appropriately inline rather than nested, and one-level pointers to related agents are clearly signaled under 'Related'.

3 / 3

Total

11

/

12

Passed

Description

82%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A solid 'Use when' description with natural trigger terms and clear what/when coverage, but it stays at a high level of action specificity and the generic 'audit/scan' vocabulary creates some overlap risk with narrower auditor skills.

Suggestions

Add a second concrete action verb (e.g., 'orchestrates parallel auditors, deduplicates findings by file:line, and produces a unified report') to lift specificity from a single audit action to multiple specific actions.

Disambiguate from single-domain auditors by signaling the meta/orchestration scope, e.g., 'Use when the user wants a unified multi-domain health check rather than a single specialized audit.'

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The description names the domain ('project-wide audit, full health check, scan across all domains') and the broad action ('audit/health check/scan') but lists only one verb category rather than multiple concrete actions like dedup, report generation, or parallel dispatch found in the body.

2 / 3

Completeness

It answers 'what' (comprehensive project-wide audit/health check/scan) and explicitly provides a 'Use when...' trigger clause, satisfying both what and when.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Phrases 'comprehensive project-wide audit', 'full health check', and 'scan across all domains' are natural terms a user would say when requesting this, with good variation coverage.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The niche (orchestrated project-wide health audit) is fairly distinct, but 'audit' and 'scan' are broad terms that could overlap with individual single-domain auditor skills or generic lint/code-review skills.

2 / 3

Total

10

/

12

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
CharlesWiltgen/Axiom
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.