Content
67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured router SKILL.md that delegates details cleanly and routes symptoms to specific files, but it pays a token tax on quadruple routing (table, dot graph, numbered tree, example invocations) and coaching sections. Its progressive disclosure design is good on paper, though all referenced files live outside this bundle.
Suggestions
Remove the dot-graph Decision Tree — it restates the numbered decision tree directly beneath it line for line and saves ~13 lines with zero information loss (conciseness).
Cut or merge "Example Invocations" into the Quick Reference table — each example repeats a row already present, and fold "Pressure Resistance" and "Anti-Rationalization" into one short section or drop them (conciseness).
Add a one-line fallback when no Quick Reference row matches (e.g., "No match? Read skills/networking-discipline.md first, then networking-diag.md") so the routing workflow has a recovery step (workflow_clarity).
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The routing core (Quick Reference table plus numbered Decision Tree) is lean, but the dot-graph Decision Tree duplicates the numbered list immediately below it, "Example Invocations" restate Quick Reference rows, and the Pressure Resistance and Anti-Rationalization sections are behavioral coaching rather than networking knowledge. Mostly efficient but clearly could be tightened; not 2 because the primary router content is genuinely useful and dense rather than padded. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Routing is concrete and executable: exact file paths per symptom ("My API request is failing with a timeout" → "Read: skills/networking-diag.md") and an explicit command ("/axiom:audit networking"). Absence of code is acceptable for an instruction-only router, but directives like "Recommend correctly" and "Respect but don't enable" are abstract; not 5 because no inline example shows what to actually do once the routed file is opened. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The numbered Decision Tree ("1. URLSession with structured concurrency? → skills/networking-discipline.md" …) gives an unambiguous, well-sequenced routing workflow, and no destructive/batch validation cap applies. Not 5 because there is no fallback/re-check step when routing misses (e.g., symptom matching multiple rows) and the redundant dual decision-tree formats add mild ambiguity. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Structure is exemplary router design: an overview with every detailed topic pushed to one-level-deep, clearly signaled references in a symptom→file table and decision tree. Not 5 because the bundle contains no files at all — every referenced path (skills/networking-*.md, skills/networking-auditor.md, skills/local-push-connectivity.md) resolves outside this skill, so navigation cannot be verified from the bundle itself. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |