Content
100%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a dense, well-structured auditor spec: a sequenced four-phase workflow with explicit validation gates, a detection catalog of concrete greps and rewrites with per-pattern preconditions, and a precise output format with output limits and false-positive rules. It adds only what Claude would not already know and stays lean throughout.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and efficient with no preamble explaining Swift concepts; every section (scope, exclusions, catalog, output format) earns its place, and it assumes Claude's competence throughout. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Concrete grep patterns, exact rewrites, per-row preconditions, and a fully specified report format make the guidance copy-paste ready; the absence of executable code is appropriate for an instruction-only auditor skill. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear four-phase sequence (Scan → Verify → Safety Gate → Report) with explicit checkpoints, reject criteria, and safety-tag assignment provides the validation feedback loops the rubric rewards. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | No external bundle files exist and none are needed; the single body is well-organized into clear sections and tables, which per the scoring notes merits a 3 for a self-contained skill. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |