Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
An exemplary progressive-disclosure router that maps concrete symptoms to precise referenced files with no padding. Its only meaningful weakness is redundancy between the dot-graph and numbered-list forms of the decision tree, which lightly costs conciseness and workflow clarity.
Suggestions
Collapse the Decision Tree into a single representation — keep either the `dot` graph or the numbered list, not both — to remove the duplicated routing and tighten conciseness.
De-duplicate the Quick Reference table against the Decision Tree so each symptom→file mapping appears once in a canonical location, improving workflow clarity.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The router body is lean, assumes Claude's competence (no UIKit primer), and uses punchy tables, but the decision tree is duplicated as both a `dot` graph and a numbered list and the Quick Reference table repeats much of the same routing, which is trimmable redundancy keeping it at 4 rather than 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Every symptom and example invocation maps to a precise, executable target — "→ Read: `skills/uikit-bridging.md`", "Launch `resize-auditor` agent" — covering the common cases; per the instruction-skill note, the absence of inline code is not penalized because the routing guidance is fully actionable. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The numbered Decision Tree (cases 0–10) and Conflict Resolution section give a clear, sequenced triage path with no destructive/batch operations requiring validation, but the two parallel decision representations (graph + list) muddy the single canonical path, so it sits at 4 rather than 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | This is a textbook overview-router: SKILL.md stays a concise index and every detailed topic is one level deep via clearly signaled references (`skills/*.md`, the Quick Reference table, and Example Invocations), with the inline-auditor fallback noted for non-Claude-Code contexts; no bundle files exist to contradict the structure. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |