Content
96%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an exemplary lean workflow: concrete executable commands, explicit safety/validation checkpoints, and a clean report template, with detail correctly pushed to a single external reference. Minor room remains to tighten the inline static-analysis checklist.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and efficient with no concept explanations or padding — every line is actionable instruction, a concrete command, or a template; it fully assumes Claude's competence. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste-ready commands ('gh pr list ...', 'gh pr checkout <NUMBER>', 'pnpm typecheck', 'mkdir -p /tmp/pr-<NUMBER>') and a complete report template covering the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 5-step sequence with explicit validation and safety checkpoints ('Record the current branch for restoration', 'Stop and ask if checkout would overwrite them', 'Stop only an instance launched by this PR-test') and a restore-with-fallback feedback loop for the destructive checkout/cleanup steps. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-structured overview that externalizes detailed Electron-instance management to a single, clearly signaled one-level-deep reference ('../cherry-electron-dev/references/electron-instance.md'); the body itself is appropriately scoped, with only minor organization gaps around inlining of the static-analysis checklist. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |