Content
90%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is lean, imperative, and fully executable, with concrete commands and named repo artifacts throughout. The CI contract provides a well-sequenced workflow with verdict enforcement, though it lacks an explicit error-recovery loop, and organization is good but not fully split out.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense with repo-specific constraints (CI contract steps, 11 environment variables, cleanup ownership rules, credential-handling prohibitions like "Do not enable Playwright Trace for credential-bearing tests") and never explains concepts Claude already knows; Playwright selector guidance is stated as repo policy rather than teaching. Every section carries non-derivable information, matching the lean-and-efficient anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Commands are copy-paste ready with env vars and absolute paths ("pnpm exec tsx scripts/e2e/regression/cli.ts run-phase --run-dir /absolute/run-directory --phase basicFeatures", "CHERRY_TEST_RUN_DIR=/tmp/cherry-regression-list pnpm test:e2e:regression --list", the four-command verification suite), plus a concrete test registration example and named files (.github/workflows/e2e-regression-test.yml, cases.ts, systemAutomation.ts, run.json) covering the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The numbered 8-step CI contract gives a clear sequence with error-handling behavior ("Continues after a failed phase", "Executor errors and interrupted phases block a passing verdict", "enforces the verdict") and the verification section provides a command checklist, but there is no explicit fix-and-retry feedback loop and run-phase does not state what to check afterward, which the top anchor requires. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist, and the two references (tests/e2e/regression/README.md, scripts/e2e/regression/README.md) are clearly signaled with purpose statements and one level deep; sections are well organized, but the body exceeds 50 lines with the 11-variable configuration listing inlined and the ../../../ relative paths are fragile, leaving minor organization gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |