Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an efficiently written instruction-only skill with a clear, gated workflow and explicit failure-recovery guidance. Its only meaningful gap is the lack of a templated structure for the diagnostic report description passed to the MCP tool.
Suggestions
Add a short template or field checklist for the 'description' argument passed to prepare_diagnostic_report (e.g., expected/actual/repro/impact) so Claude produces consistent drafts.
Optionally show the one-line decision rule for when to call mcp__assistant__diagnose as a compact conditional, mirroring the style used for the live-user gate.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean, every line is actionable, and it assumes Claude's competence with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides a copy-paste-ready MCP call, a concrete UI button name, and an explicit manual fallback path; slightly below 5 only because the 'description' argument content is not templated and only one example call is shown. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear numbered sequence with explicit approval/conditional checkpoints and an error-recovery loop (tool failure or headless session → manual submission path), and the destructive/batch cap does not apply since the skill only prepares a draft and defers submission to the user. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with no external bundle needed and four well-organized sections; the only reference is a one-level peer-skill handoff (issue-reporter), so the simple-skill exception applies. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |