Content
85%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A lean, highly actionable instruction-only skill: concrete commands, explicit success/failure semantics, and genuine validation checkpoints including diff inspection for workspace edits. The only soft spots are slight redundancy in the closing example paragraph and the unnamed success status value in the JSON result.
Suggestions
Name the actual success status value (e.g., `status: "SUCCESS"`) so success detection is unambiguous without guessing.
Trim the closing example paragraph, which restates earlier guidance on parsing `response`/`error` and inspecting the diff, down to just the scenario-specific detail (touching only named files).
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense with non-obvious operational facts Claude would not know (the 5m `--print-timeout` default, permission-mode inheritance, the exact `authentication failed or timed out` error), with no padding of known concepts. The closing 'Example' paragraph partially restates earlier guidance ("parse the `response` and any reported `error`, and inspect the resulting diff"), so minor trimming is possible — anchor 4 rather than 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | It provides a copy-paste command (`agy -p "<prompt>" --output-format json`), a concrete availability check (`command -v agy`), and explicit failure semantics ("anything other than a success status is a failure", "Treat unparseable output as failure too"). The actual success status value is never named, a minor gap that keeps it below fully executable anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear numbered sequence with explicit validation checkpoints — availability check, JSON `status` parsing, unparseable-output handling, and "inspect the diff afterward" — plus error-recovery paths (auth failure → stop and ask the user). The destructive-operation cap does not apply because validation steps are present, so the anchor-5 match holds. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A simple, single-purpose skill under 50 lines with no external references needed, organized into two clear sections (Run, Authentication And Permissions); under the rubric's simple-skill exception this scores 5, and no dangling file references exist since no bundle files are present. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |