Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
An exemplarily lean, single-purpose skill body: exact file location, a runnable creation command, a complete entry template, and a sequenced workflow with a built-in dedup checkpoint. The only meaningful improvement would be one worked example entry and explicit criteria for when an existing entry should be updated.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The ~20-line body is lean and efficient with zero padding: every section (收录标准, 文件, 条目格式, 流程, 搜索匹配, 协作) delivers operational information Claude does not already know. It explains no general concepts and matches the anchor 'lean and efficient; assumes Claude's competence; every token earns its place'. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete guidance is strong: an exact file path ('<project_root>/.cherry-assistant/faq.md'), a runnable command ('mkdir -p .cherry-assistant'), and a complete entry template. Minor gaps keep it below 5: the template placeholders (e.g. '[通用化问题表述]') are never instantiated with a worked example, and '相似但更好' (similar but better) update criteria are undefined — mostly executable with minor gaps (anchor 4). | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The flow (问题解决→判断收录标准→读FAQ查重→无重复则通用化后追加→有相似但更好则更新) gives a clear sequence with the dedup-read acting as an explicit pre-write checkpoint, and append-only writes are not destructive so the cap-3 rule does not apply. Below anchor 5 because the 'update if better' branch lacks defined criteria and there is no post-write verification step. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | This is a simple single-task skill under 50 lines with no external references needed, and the body is organized into clearly labeled sections (criteria, file, format, flow, search, collaboration). Per the rubric's simple-skill exception, well-organized sections alone merit a 5; there are no bundle files to misplace. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |