Create or update GitHub pull requests using the repository-required workflow and template compliance. Use when asked to create/open/update a PR so the assistant reads `.github/pull_request_template.md`, fills every template section, preserves markdown structure exactly, and marks missing data as N/A or None instead of skipping sections.
75
92%
Does it follow best practices?
Run evals on this skill
Adds up to 20 points to the overall score
View guide
Passed
No findings from the security scan
.github/pull_request_template.md before drafting the PR body.origin, but ask the user if they want to use a different remote.git push -u <remote> <head-branch>origin: default base is main from origin, but allow the user to explicitly indicate a base branch.main is the active v2 development line. v1 maintenance fixes (head branch hotfix/*, critical user-facing bug fixes only) must target v1, not main — set the base to v1 for these.origin: check available remotes with git remote -v, default base may be upstream/main or another remote. Always assume that user wants to merge head to CherryHQ/cherry-studio/main, unless the user explicitly indicates a base branch.mktemp + Write tool path-mismatch on Windows):
pr_body_file="/tmp/gh-pr-body-$(date +%s).md"
cat > "$pr_body_file" <<'EOF'
...filled template body...
EOFN/A or None.cat "$pr_body_file" (the Read
tool can fail on /tmp/... paths on Windows). Show the file path and ask
for explicit confirmation before creating. Skip if the user explicitly
waives preview (automation workflows).gh pr create --base <base> --head <head> --title "<title>" --body-file "$pr_body_file"rm -f "$pr_body_file"Never skip template sections.
Never rewrite the template format.
Keep content concise and specific to the current change set.
PR title and body must be written in English.
Never create the PR before showing the full final body to the user, unless they explicitly waive the preview or confirmation.
Never rely on command permission prompts as PR body preview.
Release note & Documentation checkbox — both are driven by whether the change is user-facing. Use the table below:
| Change type | Release note | Docs [x] |
|---|---|---|
| New user-facing feature / setting / UI | Describe the change | ✅ |
| Bug fix visible to users | Describe the fix | ✅ if behavior changed |
| Behavior change / default value change | Describe + action required | ✅ |
| Security fix in a user-facing dependency | Describe the fix | ✅ if usage changed |
| CI / GitHub Actions changes | NONE | ❌ |
| Internal refactoring (user cannot tell) | NONE | ❌ |
| Dev / build tooling changes | NONE | ❌ |
| Dev-only dependency bump | NONE | ❌ |
| Test-only / code style changes | NONE | ❌ |
# read template
cat .github/pull_request_template.md
# show this full Markdown body in chat first
pr_body_file="/tmp/gh-pr-body-$(date +%s).md"
cat > "$pr_body_file" <<'EOF'
...filled template body...
EOF
cat "$pr_body_file"
# run only after explicit user confirmation
gh pr create --base <base> --head <head> --title "<title>" --body-file "$pr_body_file"
rm -f "$pr_body_file"49c351a
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.