Conciseness

The ~28-line body is lean and operational with zero concept-explanation padding; every line carries a decision, command, or rule. The single explanatory note ("Skills 是第三方代码有完整权限") directly justifies the mandatory security warning and earns its place, matching anchor 5.

Actionability

Concrete copy-paste-ready commands are given throughout: "npx skills find [query]", "npx skills add <owner/repo@skill> -y", "npx skills init <skill-name>", plus an explicit runtime fallback chain ("优先 npx skills，备选 $CHERRY_STUDIO_BUN_PATH x skills，都没有则提示安装 Node.js"). It stops short of 5 because step 4's validation ("验证 frontmatter、触发描述和一个真实用例") specifies what to validate but not how, and no example of expected search/add output is shown.

Workflow Clarity

Both workflows are explicitly sequenced with arrows and numbered steps, the install flow enforces a hard checkpoint before a risky third-party-code operation ("展示安全警告→提供源码链接→用户确认→npx skills add … -y"), and creation step 4 is an explicit validate→fix→re-run feedback loop ("验证失败就修正后重跑"). This matches anchor 5; the destructive-operation cap does not apply because confirmation and retry loops are present.

Progressive Disclosure

The skill is under 50 lines, needs no external reference files (none exist in the bundle), and is organized into two clearly labeled sections (搜索和安装 / 创建 Skills) with an inline external reference link. Per the rubric's simple-skill guideline, this qualifies for 5 with just well-organized sections.

Specificity

"搜索、安装或创建 Agent Skill" lists three concrete actions (search, install, create) in a named domain, matching 'lists several specific actions; minor gaps in coverage'. It falls short of 5 because coverage is not comprehensive (e.g., updating, removing, or listing skills is absent).

Completeness

It explicitly answers 'what' (search, install, or create Agent Skills) and 'when' ("用户说…或想扩展能力时使用") with concrete quoted trigger phrases, matching anchor 5. It is not 4 because the 'when' clause is fully explicit with specific triggers rather than merely adequate.

Trigger Term Quality

The quoted triggers "find a skill", "搜索技能", "帮我做个 skill" and "扩展能力" are natural phrases users would actually say, in both English and Chinese. A few natural terms are missing (e.g., an install- or add-skill trigger phrase), which fits anchor 4 rather than the comprehensive synonym coverage of 5.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Agent Skill management is a clear niche with distinct, specific triggers, so it is mostly distinguishable with only minor overlap risk against a dedicated skill-creation skill. It is not 3 since the triggers are far more specific than generic examples like "Works with document files".