Content
90%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a lean, highly actionable procedural guide with a clear sequenced workflow and verification steps; its main gaps are missing explicit error-recovery loops and minor room for file splitting.
Suggestions
Add an explicit feedback loop in the verification section (e.g., 'If autoninja or tests fail, fix and re-run before proceeding').
Consider moving full BUILD.gn target templates into a reference file to tighten the main body further.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence — it never explains what DevTools, BUILD.gn, or barrel files are, and every line is actionable, matching the 5 anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste-ready commands ('npm run test -- front_end/<old_location>', 'autoninja -C out/Default', 'npm run lint'), exact import paths, and concrete BUILD.gn target structures, fully executable across the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear numbered sequence (Preparation → Structure → Build → Registration → Refactoring → Verification) with a verification checklist and regression checks; not a 5 because explicit 'if it fails, fix and re-run' feedback loops are only implied rather than stated. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into clearly headed sections with a self-contained procedure that needs no external references; not a 5 because the body is slightly over the ~50-line simple-skill threshold and a couple of sections (e.g., full BUILD.gn templates) could be split out. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |