Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
An excellent, dense procedural skill: a complete numbered workflow with before/after validation, exact commands and dependency values, and a pitfalls section that preempts the common failure modes. The only noticeable gap is that the BUILD.gn layout is specified in prose rather than as a single complete example block.
Suggestions
Include one complete, copy-paste-ready BUILD.gn example for a hypothetical model (e.g., front_end/models/example_model/BUILD.gn with all three targets filled in) instead of describing the targets in prose.
Add the specific grep command for updating consumers (e.g., how to find all importers of the old barrel path) to make section 4 as executable as sections 0 and 5.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence: every line is a rule, an exact command, or a pitfall, with no explanations of concepts Claude already knows (no 'what BUILD.gn is', no library overviews). It matches the 'lean and efficient; every token earns its place' anchor and is above level 4, which would still contain minor trimmable over-explanation. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is mostly executable: exact commands ('npm run test -- front_end/<old_location>', 'autoninja -C out/Default', 'npm run lint'), exact BUILD.gn field values ('ts_deps = [ ":bundle" ]', 'entrypoint = "<model_name>.ts"'), and a concrete import statement. The minor gap keeping it below level 5 is that the central artifact — the BUILD.gn file — is described in prose target-by-target rather than shown as one complete copy-paste-ready block. It is above level 3 because nothing is pseudocode and all field names and values are exact. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 0→5 sequence with explicit validation checkpoints: baseline tests before touching anything ('Run existing tests... to ensure they pass before you touch anything'), and a final verification checklist covering build, lint, new tests, and regression tests on the old location. This matches the 'clear sequence with explicit validation steps' anchor, and the pitfalls section supplies the error-recovery knowledge, so it is above level 4's 'minor validation gaps'. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | This is a ~50-line single-file skill with no bundle files, well organized into numbered sections (Preparation, File Structure, Build Configuration, Global Registration, Refactoring, Verification) plus a pitfalls section. Per the scoring notes, a short skill with no need for external references and well-organized sections scores 5; there is nothing that belongs in a separate file and no navigation debt. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |